Anwar’s Evasive Tactics

AIDCNews – Ever since High Court Judge Datuk Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah ordered Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to enter his defence on May 16, the de facto PKR leader has been going all out to avoid court appearance.

Twice the court has fixed the dates for Anwar to enter his defence, nevertheless on both occasions his defence team managed to side step the process by applying for a trial within a trial, which subsequently had enabled Anwar to avoid going to court to defend himself.

The court fixed June 6 until Jun 30, but four days before the defence dates, on June 2, Anwar applied for the judge to be dropped.

On June 6 the judge decided that he would not recuse himself as they were no reasons for him to do so. The attempt was seen as Anwar’s third in trying to get a judge off his case.

However, Judge Mohd Zabidin allowed the application by the defence to postpone the case for 37 days while waiting for a decision from the Court of Appeal.

The court fixed July 13 for proceedings to recommence.

On July 6 the Court of Appeal rejected Anwar’s appeal over the refusal of Judge Mohd Zabidin from recusing himself.

Appeals Court Judge, Datuk Hassan Lah made the decision after listening to the arguments from both the defence and the prosecution.

“We find no reason not to agree with the High Court decision on June 6,” he said.

Subsequent to the court’s rejection of the appeal, Anwar’s lawyer, Karpal Singh made another application to postpone the mention date till July 13.

The judge, however, rejected Karpal’s application.

Anwar succeeded in postponing his defence for 40 days from June 2 until July 13 with his application to recuse the judge.

On July 13 the court once again fixed from August 8 until August 26 for the de facto PKR leader to enter his defence.

However, on July 26 and August 1, 14 days before his defence was due, Anwar came up with another application to interview 15 witnesses before he would do so.

It looks like Anwar is repeating his earlier tactic on June 6 when he avoided entering his defence by making another application.

What all this points to is the August 8 date, when Anwar was supposed to enter his defence will again be postponed to allow the court to deliberate both his applications to call the 15 witnesses.

Why is Anwar so reluctant to enter his defence?

Why is he always looking for ways to wriggle from the path and seek trial postponement?

The reason could be Anwar Ibrahim does not have an alibi to defend himself.

We have to wait and see what he will do next…

Source : AIDC

Video 3D Khalid Samad vs Mahfuz Omar: PAS Menipu Dan Mengkhianati Islam

Doa laknat sememangnya mainan parti PAS! 

Parti seperti inikah yang dikatakan memperjuangkan islam?

“Kita bincang isu Selangor dan buat keputusan untuk terus ke medan yang mana kalau kita lihat ia sengaja dijadikan isu oleh Barisan Nasional (BN) untuk tutup isu Himpunan Bersih 2.0," kenyataan Presiden PAS Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang pada 07-08-2011 sila rujuk disini...

“Kami berpuas hati dengan penjelasan yang diberi Datuk Hasan. Tindakan Jais juga kami sokong dan wajar memandangkan pendekatan yang diambil adalah untuk mempertahankan Islam dan wajar disokong oleh semua pihak agar tidak timbul sebarang keraguan.


“Jais ambil kesempatan dalam setiap tindakan dan penguatkuasaan iaitu menepati kaedah atau prosedur untuk difahami dan patuhi segala peraturan yang ada,” kenyataan Dewan Pemuda PAS Nasrudin Hassan pada 09-08-2011 sila rujuk disini...

PAS kantoi kerana menipu dan mengkhianati Islam. 

Kedua-dua kenyataan diatas jelas menunjukkan PAS menipu dan mengkhianati Islam, tetapi sayangnya kebanyakan ahli-ahli PAS tidak memahaminya, kerana kedangkalan mereka sendiri. Mereka terpengaruh dengan beberapa kerat individu yang bertopengkan Ulama' tetapi anehnya bertindak seperti penyangak.

Islam bukan mengira ulama', Islam lebih mengutamakan mereka yang berjuang untuk menyatu padu umatnya, kerana dengan perpaduan itu islam dapat membangun. 

PAS dilihat berusaha untuk bekerjasama dengan DAP yang terang-terang menentang penubuhan negara islam yang diperjuangkan oleh PAS, tetapi PAS melupakan itu semua kerana kepentingan politik. Fikir-fikirkan lah...

Politik Harian/Bro Jinggo

Lim Guan Eng Perlu Jawab Tiga Soalan Berkenaan Penipuan Pembinaan Rumah Kos Rendah Di Pulau Pinang

Tiga persoalan yang harus dijawab oleh Guan Eng:

1. Adakah rumah kos rendah sederhana itu dibina oleh kerajaan negeri atau kerajaan pusat?
2. Di manakah ianya dibina?
3. Siapa pembelinya?

Perkara inilah yang perlu Guan Eng dedahkan. Bukan hanya mengaku sudah membina tetapi tidak memaklumkan di mana ianya dibina.

Guan Eng mendakwa telah membina 11,596 rumah berharga kos rendah dan sederhana berharga antara RM42 ribu hingga ke RM72 ribu dan daripada jumlah tersebut, 3,421 buah rumah telah dibina oleh kerajaan dan selebihnya oleh pihak swasta.

Sekiranya benar kerajaan negeri ada membina rumah kos rendah dan sederhana seperti yang didakwa, war-warkan di manakah tempat perumahan tersebut dibina dan agensi kerajaan manakah yang bertanggungjawab membina perumahan tersebut.

Terangkan kepada rakyat, mengenai tiga persoalan tersebut kerana apa yang dilihat, Kerajaan Pulau Pinang hanya taksub membina rumah mewah dan menyebabkan mereka yang tidak mampu terutamanya orang Melayu berhijrah ke negeri lain.

Tindakan tersebut menyebabkan orang Melayu semakin 'pupus' dari Pulau Pinang. Adakah ini antara agenda DAP untuk menghalau orang Melayu keluar dari Pulau Pinang?